California Highway Patrol Faces High Vacancy Rates Despite Record Raises

The California Highway Patrol (CHP) is grappling with a significant challenge: a high vacancy rate in its officer positions, even as the agency has rolled out historic pay raises and incentives. Last year, nearly one in six CHP positions were unfilled, a sharp increase from 2019 levels. This staffing shortfall comes at a crucial time for Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration, which has been actively deploying CHP officers to address crime in cities like Oakland and promoting a major recruitment campaign to boost the force’s numbers.

Rising Vacancy Rates Amid Historic Pay Increases

Despite efforts to attract and retain officers, the CHP is facing a notable shortage of personnel. A report from the Legislative Analyst’s Office revealed that the vacancy rate for CHP officers soared by 94% between 2015 and 2023. In 2019, the vacancy rate stood at just 5%, but by 2023, it had jumped to 16%.

This increase is particularly striking given the generous pay raises CHP officers have received in recent years. In 2023, officers were awarded a 7.9% wage increase—the largest in two decades—following a 6.2% general salary increase in 2022. These raises are among the highest the agency has ever seen, reflecting the state’s efforts to make CHP positions more attractive. Currently, rookie CHP officers can expect to earn up to $117,000 in their first year on duty.

Newsom’s Recruitment Efforts and the CHP 1000 Campaign

In response to the staffing challenges, Governor Newsom has made bolstering the CHP a priority. Earlier this month, his administration finalized a new contract with the union representing CHP officers, a deal expected to cost $489 million over the next three years. The agreement includes a mix of raises and enhanced pay incentives aimed at boosting recruitment and retention.

Additionally, Newsom launched the “CHP 1000” campaign in 2022, with the goal of hiring hundreds of new officers to fill vacancies. The campaign is part of a broader strategy to address local crime challenges, as the governor has been deploying CHP officers to cities grappling with public safety issues.

Challenges in Recruitment and Retention

Despite these efforts, the CHP’s high vacancy rate remains a persistent issue. The Legislative Analyst’s Office report identified several factors contributing to the problem. One key issue is that the CHP faces no direct consequences for failing to meet its hiring targets. The current pay formula, which ties CHP officer salaries to the average compensation at five other major California law enforcement agencies, does not adjust based on the agency’s success or failure in recruiting and retaining employees.

“The current formula does not contain any factor that adjusts pay increases based on the success or failure of CHP to actually recruit and retain employees,” the report noted.

However, there are signs of improvement. After the report was published, the CHP announced that its vacancy rate had declined to 12% as of last week. The agency is reportedly on track to exceed its hiring goals for the year, according to CHP spokesperson Jaime Coffee.

The pandemic played a significant role in exacerbating the CHP’s staffing challenges. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the CHP suspended its training academy, delaying the start dates for a new class of cadets by more than a year. Additionally, the agency has experienced an uptick in retirements since the pandemic, further straining its ability to maintain staffing levels.

A Unique Pay Structure and Its Implications

The CHP’s pay structure is unique among California’s state employee unions. By law, raises for CHP officers are based on the average compensation at the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Office and the police departments in Los Angeles, San Diego, Oakland, and San Francisco. This arrangement, established in 1974, was designed to align CHP officer pay with some of the state’s largest and most expensive metro areas.

While this pay formula has been beneficial for the union—the California Association of Highway Patrolmen—allowing it to avoid direct wage negotiations with the governor, it has also sparked criticism. The Legislative Analyst’s Office has questioned why CHP officers, many of whom do not live or work in these costly urban areas, should receive raises based on these benchmarks. The office suggested repealing the provision, arguing that it no longer reflects the cost of living for many officers.

“These five jurisdictions today represent among the most expensive regions of the state and are not where many highway patrol officers work,” the report stated.

Additional Incentives in the New Contract

Beyond the continuation of the existing pay formula, the new contract between the state and the CHP union includes several additional incentives aimed at enhancing retention. These perks include a new level of seniority pay for officers with more than 27 years of experience, who will now receive an incentive worth 10% of their base wages.

There are also pay boosts for officers with motorcycle assignments and additional compensation for those who work with police dogs. As the CHP strives to address its high vacancy rates, the combination of historic raises, enhanced pay incentives, and targeted recruitment efforts reflects a significant investment in the state’s public safety infrastructure.

However, the challenges of aligning officer pay with the realities of the job market, alongside the lingering effects of the pandemic, underscore the complexities of staffing one of California’s most critical law enforcement agencies. With Governor Newsom’s administration committed to bolstering the ranks of the CHP, the coming years will be pivotal in determining whether these strategies will successfully close the gap and build a stronger, more resilient force.